Assessing risk among frail older adults in Ontario, Canada, during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed methods evaluation of a telephone outreach program

We developed a pandemic telephone outreach protocol to identify risk for social isolation, health destabilization, medication issues, inadequate services and supports, and caregiver stress among older adults at high risk of destabilization. Screening, conducted between April 1, 2020, and May 8, 2020, was targeted to those who had previously been screened as frail or who were identified as vulnerable by their family physician. This study describes the implementation and results of this risk screening protocol and describes patient, caregiver, and health professional perceptions of this outreach initiative. Mixed methods included satisfaction surveys and interviews completed by patients/caregivers (N = 300 and N = 26, respectively) and health professionals (N = 18 and N = 9, respectively). A medical record audit collected information on patient characteristics and screening outcomes. A total of 335 patients were screened in the early weeks of the pandemic, of whom 23% were identified with at least one risk factor, most commonly related to the potential for health destabilization and medication risk. Follow-up referrals were made most frequently to physicians, a pharmacist, and a social worker. The outreach calls were very well received by patients and caregivers who described feeling cared for and valued at a time when they were socially isolated and lonely. The outreach calls provided access to trusted COVID-19 information and reassurance that health care was still available. The majority of health professionals (>86%) were "very" or "extremely" satisfied with the ease of completing the screening via telephone and value for time spent;for 79% the protocol was "very" or "extremely" feasible to implement. Health professional interviews revealed that patients were unaware they could access care during the pandemic lockdown but were reassured that care was available, potential crises were averted, and they supported future implementation. Risk screening provides a significant opportunity to provide information, support, and mitigate potential risks and is an important and feasible component of pandemic planning in primary care.

Falls Prevention: Community Exercise Programme, Reducing Risk of Falls, Deconditioning and Loneliness in Frail Elderly Patients

Introduction Covid has had a devastating effect on the Elderly, resulting in deconditioning, increased falls and loneliness. Tailored exercises can reduce falls in people aged over 65 by 54% and participation in physical activity reduces the risk of hip fractures by 50%, currently costing the NHS 1.7 billion per year in England. This 8-week intervention delivered by trained volunteers in patient's homes, aims to reduce deconditioning, loneliness and the risk, incidence and fear of falling (FOF) amongst frail patients post-discharge from hospital. Method A gap in service was identified in Frail patients discharged from hospital, at risk of falling and awaiting community physiotherapy. A steering group was set up including acute and community therapists, volunteers and carers to design a collaborative intervention to bridge the gap. At risk patients were identified and referred by ward therapists supported by the hospital volunteering team. Volunteers were trained to deliver an 8 weeks programme of progressive exercises in patients' homes with additional signposting to appropriate statutory and voluntary services. Qualitative and quantitative outcome measures were taken at week 1 and week 8 of the intervention Results 91.5% total health outcomes improved or maintained by average: - FOF reduced by 22.5% - 180 degree turn improved by 43% - 60 sec Sit to Stand improved by 14.75% - Timed Up And Go improved by 15.5% - Confidence to cope at home improved by 15% - Pain / discomfort (self-reported) improved by 18.75% - Overall health (self-reported) improved by 8.5% Conclusion(s) Targeted exercise at home with skilled volunteers can improve functional fitness and health outcomes in a frail elderly population at risk of falls when discharged home from hospital. The programme increases patients' connectivity to local voluntary and community sector services. Volunteers' mental health improves by engaging in meaningful service.

Clinical features and prognostic factors affecting survival of ambulatory followed COVID-19 patients aged over 65 years

Aim: The majority of the patients with COVID-19 are followed ambulatory. Determination of prognostic factors of mortality in risky groups is essential to improve patient management. The aim of this study is to describe the clinical presentation in patients over 65 years of age with COVID-19 who are followed up at home by a physician and provide insights into the initial prognostic factors in this distinctive population. Material(s) and Method(s): This is a retrospective and observational study. Clinical records of the patients aged over 65 years who were visited by the filiation team, including a physician at home, due to the diagnosis of COVID-19 disease within 2 months were reviewed. Factors affecting mortality were examined. Result(s): Our study included 51 deceased (mean age: 75,1+/-9,0 years, 40,2% males), and 102 patients with COVID-19 who survived (mean age: 73,0+/-6,9 years, 68,6% male). Platelet count ( < 150.000, OR 7,26, p=0,001), CRP level ( < 4, OR 4,55, p=0,02), albumin level ( OR 3,24, p=0,02), and Troponin I level (OR 0,03, p=0,02) were the strongest predictors for death. When propensity score matching was applied, gender (male, OR 7,14, p=0,02) and platelet count (< 150.000, OR 5,34, p=0,02) were the strongest predictors. Discussion(s): Elderly COVID-19 patients have a high mortality rate. An easily measurable and accessible platelet count may be a predictor of a bad outcome. Close follow-up and timely treatment may significantly reduce mortality in high-risk elderly patients under.Copyright © 2022, Derman Medical Publishing. All rights reserved.

Virtual Frailty Ward - Post Discharge Frailty Support

Background In response to the COVID pandemic when new robust discharge criteria were introduced to facilitate early discharge to optimise hospital capacity, Virtual Frailty Ward (VFW) was established. VFW provides nurse-led telephone follow-up for patients discharged primarily from the Emergency Department (ED) and the Acute Frailty unit (AFU). Objectives We aim to provide continuity of care by following up frail elderly patients at home, reviewing their medical, functional and social progress post discharge and ensuring they received adequate support to avoid hospital re-admission. Methods The service is overseen by the Lead Frailty Practitioner, supported by Consultant Geriatricians. Calls are made Monday to Friday by a team of Advanced Specialist Nurses. The case load is split up into 3 categories with different levels of priorities - 1: at least weekly calls;2: Fortnightly calls;3: Monthly calls. This service engages closely with community partners such as community frailty service, social care, district nurses and general practitioners. Results In year 1 (1/4/2020-31/3/2021), we had 598 patients on this VFW. 93 patients were referred to therapy team for urgent equipment to maintain safety, 73 patients were referred to community frailty and 112 patients had urgent discussions with GP to avoid hospital admissions. The 30 days readmissions rate was 14%. 547 patients were discharged. In year 2 (1/4/2021 - 31/3/2022), we had 297 patients. 49 patients were referred to therapy team, 32 patients were referred to community frailty team, and 41 patients required input from GP. The 30-day readmission rate was 11%. 224 patients were discharged. Conclusion VFW is a cost- effective service that has helped to reduce length of stay of frail elderly patients in an acute hospital setting, maintaining patient safety and prevent hospital re-admission, co-ordinated with community services. Our service has been highlighted in the recent GIRFT report on improving clinical practice.

Evaluating an undergraduate nursing student telehealth placement for community-dwelling frail older people during the COVID-19 pandemic.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a rapid response student telehealth placement experience implementing interRAI assessments of community-dwelling frail older people during the COVID-19 pandemic. To identify lessons to inform future telehealth clinical placements. BACKGROUND: New Zealand undertakes assessment of older people with disabilities using the interRAI contact assessment tool for less complex conditions and home care assessment tool for complex needs. New Zealand entered lockdown in March 2020 in response to COVID-19. New Zealand's most vulnerable community members required urgent needs assessment. DESIGN: A clinical placement whereby 3rd year undergraduate nursing students trained by interRAI-NZ educators worked remotely from home delivering telehealth assessment for 'at risk' older people across the Waikato District, New Zealand. This represented the first telehealth experience within an undergraduate nursing program approved by the New Zealand Nursing Council. METHODS: A case study evaluation utilising mixed method questionnaire and qualitative techniques within an interpretive paradigm. 19 third year students in the fifth semester of a Bachelor of Nursing program and 5 nursing staff members engaged in delivery of the initiative completed pre- and post-placement short answer questionnaires. Reflective diaries were maintained by students on placement. Post-placement interviews and focus group discussions provided in-depth data. COREQ guidelines informed analysis and reporting. RESULTS: Student and tutor responses showed consistent themes: tackling COVID-19; implementation requirements; nursing competencies; provider relationships; and community insights. These provide insight and highlight lessons learnt from this initiative. CONCLUSIONS: Student confidence in therapeutic engagement and clinical assessment and interest in aged care was increased, confirming the viability and importance of this inaugural telehealth student placement initiative. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Graduate work readiness is enhanced through telehealth placement experience and interRAI assessor training. These are recommended as core components of future nursing education programs.

The impact of age on intensive care.

Caring for the elderly has always been challenging for the intensive care unit (ICU) physician. Concerns like frailty, comorbidities, polypharmacy and advanced directives come up even before admission into the unit. The COVID-19 pandemic has put forward a variety of issues concerning elderly populations, making the topic more relevant than ever. Admittance to the ICU, an unequivocally multifactorial decision, requires special consideration from the side of the physician when caring for an elderly person. Patients' wishes are to be respected and thus given priority. Triage assessment must also account for age-related physiological alterations and functional status. Once in the ICU, special attention should be given to age-related specificities, such as therapeutic interventions' controversial role, infection susceptibility, and post-operative care, that could potentially alter the course of hospitalization and affect outcomes. Following ICU discharge, ensuring proper rehabilitation for both survivors and their caregivers can improve long-term outcomes and subsequent quality of life. The pandemic and its implications may limit the standard of care for the elderly requiring ICU support. Socioeconomic factors that further perplex the situation must be addressed. Elderly patients currently represent a vast expanding population in ICU. Tailoring safe treatment plans to match patients' wishes, and personalized needs will guide critical care for the elderly from this time forward.

Caregivers' Concerns About Assisted Living Residents' Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

Family or friend caregivers' concerns about assisted living (AL) residents' mental health are reflective of poor resident and caregiver mental health. COVID-19-related visiting restrictions increased caregiver concerns, but research on these issues in AL is limited. Using web-based surveys with 673 caregivers of AL residents in Western Canada, we assessed the prevalence and correlates of moderate to severe caregiver concerns about residents' depressed mood, loneliness, and anxiety in the 3 months before and after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. Caregiver concerns doubled after the start of the pandemic (resident depressed mood: 23%-50%, loneliness: 29%-62%, anxiety: 24%-47%). Generalized linear mixed models identified various modifiable risk factors for caregiver concerns (e.g., caregivers' perception that residents lacked access to counseling services or not feeling well informed about and involved in resident care). These modifiable factors can be targeted in efforts to prevent or mitigate caregiver concerns and resident mental health issues.

Contributions of the university intergenerational project in times of pandemic. An educational innovation

The COVID-19 situation naturalized the emergence of new teaching practices, and the use of educational technologies, in a context of transformation of the participation of seniors. The objective of the work consists in the evaluation of an intergenerational experience that occurred in the pandemic through the use of new technologies. An exploratory descriptive study was carried out using a questionnaire as an instrument, created ad hoc, with open and closed questions, with the aim of evaluating, through the opinion of 108 participants, a virtual intergenerational experience was evaluated between students of the social education degree and older people from social centers, to find out their needs, and offer a resource incorporated from the classroom. This is not just a theoretical difference. This situation is having repercussions on policies, but also on the way of attending to the educational and cultural needs of the elderly, which are clearly being diminished due to the coronavirus. (English) [ FROM AUTHOR]

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Frailty in Older Adults

Objective: This study examines the effects of the Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on frailty in a group of older adults at the end of the first year of the pandemic. Materials and Methods: The cross-sectional study was conducted at the end of the first year of the pandemic. Our study included 394 older adults who were contacted at primary care health centers. The FRAIL scale, the coronavirus fear scale and the scale of adjustment to measures in respiratory disease outbreaks in the Elderly were used. Results: The average age of the 394 individuals who participated was 70.38±5.68 years. Overall, 33% of the individuals have been infected with COVID-19. It was found that the prefrail and frail older populations increased by 2.7% and 13.8%, respectively, in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. The pandemic was found to have a moderate effect on the frailty scores. The risk of frailty was found to be 2 [odds ratio (OR)=2.04, confidence interval (CI) (95%)=1.28-3.23] times higher in individuals that tested positive for COVID-19. The fear of coronavirus increased the risk of frailty by 1.08 times [OR=1.08, CI (95%)=1.03-1.13]. The risk of frailty was reduced by 1.03 [OR=0.96, CI (95%)=0.94-0.99] times in the older adults who complied with the precautions. Conclusion: COVID-19 and the fear of COVID-19 it causes increase the risk of frailty among the older adults. Compliance with the recommended measures reduces the risk of frailty. © Copyright 2022 by the Academic Geriatrics Society / European Journal of Geriatrics and Gerontology published by Galenos Publishing House.

Association between Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and clinical presentation and outcomes in older inpatients with COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a physiological condition characterized by a decreased reserve to stressors. In patients with COVID-19, frailty is a risk factor for in-hospital mortality. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between clinical presentation, analytical and radiological parameters at admission, and clinical outcomes according to frailty, as defined by the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), in old people hospitalized with COVID-19. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included people aged 65 years and older and admitted with community-acquired COVID-19 from 3 March 2020 to 31 April 2021. Patients were categorized using the CFS. Primary outcomes were symptoms of COVID-19 prior to admission, mortality, readmission, admission in intensive care unit (ICU), and need for invasive mechanical ventilation. Analysis of clinical symptoms, clinical outcomes, and CFS was performed using multivariable logistic regression, and results were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Of the 785 included patients, 326 (41.5%, 95% CI 38.1%-45.0%) were defined as frail (CFS ≥ 5 points): 208 (26.5%, 95% CI 23.5%-29.7%) presented mild-moderate frailty (CFS 5-6 points) and 118 (15.0%, 95% CI 12.7%-17.7%), severe frailty (7-9 points). After adjusting for epidemiological variables (age, gender, residence in a nursing home, and Charlson comorbidity index), frail patients were significantly less likely to present dry cough (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.40-0.83), myalgia-arthralgia (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.29-0.75), and anosmia-dysgeusia (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.23-0.94). Confusion was more common in severely frail patients (OR 3.14; 95% CI 1.64-5.97). After adjusting for epidemiological variables, the risk of in-hospital mortality was higher in frail patients (OR 2.79, 95% CI 1.79-4.25), including both those with mild-moderate frailty (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.23-3.19) and severe frailty (OR 5.44, 95% CI 3.14-9.42). Readmission was higher in frail patients (OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.07-4.16), but only in mild-moderate frailty (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.17-4.75).. CONCLUSION: Frail patients presented atypical symptoms (less dry cough, myalgia-arthralgia, and anosmia-dysgeusia, and more confusion). Frailty was an independent predictor for death, regardless of severity, and mild-moderate frailty was associated with readmission.

[The use of telemedicine with frail elderly patients in the Netherlands - experience of caregivers in an outpatient setting]. / Teleconsulten op de polikliniek geriatrie in Nederland ­ ervaringen van zorgverleners.

The use of telemedicine (telephone and video consultations) has increased over the past decades and has grown substantially during the COVID-19 pandemic. Multimorbidity, visual - and hearing impairment, cognitive impairment and lack of technical skills might complicate the use of telemedicine in frail elderly patients. Limited research on this topic is has been performed. The aim of this article is to investigate which elements of care could be performed by telemedicine and what patient characteristics are useful in selecting patients for telemedicine. To get more information about the use of telemedicine in frail elderly patients, an online survey was conducted amongst caregivers working in geriatric outpatient care departments in the Netherlands. 67 caregivers completed the survey. The results indicate there is limited experience in video consultations in this population. The experience so far is mainly positive. Caregivers indicate the following elements of care could be performed by telemedicine: follow-up consultations, taking an (hetero)anamnesis, medication review, conversations with multiple contacts or caregivers and informing about test results. Our advice is to decide in dialogue with patient and caregiver, which form of consultation is feasible, desirable and appropriate for every individual process and consultation.

COVID-19 Vaccination Delivery in Long-Term-Care using the CARD (Comfort Ask Relax Distract) System: Mixed Methods study of Implementation Drivers.

Objectives: CARD (comfort, ask, relax, distract) is a vaccine delivery framework that includes interventions to improve the patient's experience. CARD has not been previously implemented in long-term care (LTC) settings. This study evaluated drivers to implementation for COVID-19 vaccinations in an LTC facility. Methods: Postimplementation interpretive evaluation including qualitative interviews and quantitative surveys with eight participants. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used for analysis. Adverse reactions to vaccinations and CARD interventions, including local reactogenicity and systemic reactions, were abstracted from medical charts of residents. Results: Eight CFIR constructs emerged. Staff perceived CARD was complex because it added steps to vaccination delivery. Motivated to meet residents' needs, a receptive implementation climate of support among staff led to using strategies within CARD, such as administering topical anesthetics and omitting alcohol skin antisepsis prior to injections. Having an effective network like the residents council positively influenced implementation by allowing residents to voice their opinions. Facilitators to implementation included staff knowledge and beliefs and staff's commitment to their organization, which was focused on person-centered care. Barriers included lack of available resources (inadequate staffing), insufficient communication between management and staff and lack of awareness of CARD, and external policies not aligned with CARD. Chart reviews conducted for 93 vaccinated residents corroborated perceptions of vaccination and CARD intervention safety, revealing a low rate of local and systemic adverse reactions and no cases of skin infection. Discussion: We identified positive and negative implementation drivers. Future research is recommended to expand the strategies employed and involve residents more directly.

Objectifs: Le système CARD (confort, aide, relaxation, distraction) est un cadre d'administration de vaccins qui comprend des interventions pour amèliorer l'expérience du patient. Le système CARD n'a pas été mis en œuvre précédemment dans les établissements de soins de longue durée. Cette étude a évalué les facteurs de sa mise en œuvre pour la vaccination contre la COVID-19 dans un établissement de soins de longue durée.Méthodes: Évaluation interprétative après la mise en œuvre, y compris des entretiens qualitatifs et des enquêtes quantitatives auprès de huit participants. Le Cadre consolidé pour la recherche sur la mise en œuvre (CFIR) a été utilisé pour l'analyse. Les effets indésirables à la vaccination et aux interventions CARD, y compris la réactogénicité locale et les réactions systémiques, ont été extraites des dossiers médicaux des résidentsRésultats: Huit construits du CFIR ont émergé. Le personnel a perçu que le système CARD était complexe car il ajoutait des étapes à la vaccination. Motivé à répondre aux besoins des résidents, un climat de mise en œuvre réceptif suscitant le soutien du personnel a conduit à l'utilisation de stratégies propres au système CARD, telles que l'administration d'anesthésiques topiques et l'omission de l'antisepsie cutanée à l'alcool avant les injections. Le fait d'avoir un réseau efficace comme le conseil des résidents a influencé positivement la mise en œuvre en permettant à ces derniers d'exprimer leurs opinions. Les facilitateurs de la mise en œuvre comprenaient les connaissances et les croyances du personnel et l'engagement de celui-ci envers l'organisation, qui mettait l'accent sur les soins centrés sur la personne. Les obstacles comprenaient le manque de disponibilité des ressources (effectifs insuffisants), l'insuffisance de la communication entre la direction et le personnel et le manque de connaissances au sujet de CARD, de même que les politiques externes non alignées avec le système CARD. Un examen des dossiers effectué pour 93 résidents vaccinés a corroboré les perceptions de la sécurité de la vaccination et de l'intervention CARD tout en révélant un faible taux d'effets indésirables locaux et systémiques et aucun cas d'infection cutanée.Discussion: Nous avons identifié des facteurs de mise en œuvre positifs et négatifs. Des recherches futures sont recommandées pour élargir les stratégies utilisées et impliquer plus directement les résidents.

Risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, hospitalization and death for COVID-19 in people with Parkinson's disease or parkinsonism over a 15-month period: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The patterns of long term risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, hospitalization for COVID-19 and related death are uncertain in people with Parkinson's disease (PD) or parkinsonism (PS). The aim of the study was to quantify these risks compared to a control population cohort, during the period March 2020-May 2021, in Bologna, northern Italy. METHOD: ParkLink Bologna cohort (759 PD; 192 PS) and controls (9,226) anonymously matched (ratio 1:10) for sex, age, district, comorbidity were included. Data were analysed in the whole period and in the two different pandemic waves (March-May 2020 and October 2020-May 2021). RESULTS: Adjusted hazard ratio of SARS-CoV-2 infection was 1.3 (95% CI 1.04-1.7) in PD and 1.9 (1.3-2.8) in PS compared to the controls. The trend was detected in both the pandemic waves. Adjusted hazard ratio of hospitalization for COVID-19 was 1.1 (95% CI 0.8-1.7) in PD and 1.8 (95% CI 0.97-3.1) in PS. A higher risk of hospital admission was detected in PS only in the first wave. The 30-day mortality risk after hospitalization was higher (p=0.048) in PS (58%) than in PD (19%) and controls (26%). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with controls, after adjustment for key covariates, people with PD and PS showed a higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection throughout the first 15 months of the pandemic. COVID-19 hospitalization risk was increased only in people with PS and only during the first wave. This group of patients was burdened by a very high risk of death after infection and hospitalization.

The Effectiveness of an Outpatient Personalized Multidisciplinary Intervention Model, Guided by Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, for Pre-Frail and Frail Elderly

Background: Our study evaluates the efficacy of an outpatient personalized multidisciplinary intervention model guided by comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA), for pre-frail and frail elderly. Methods: A single-arm self-controlled study was conducted at the outpatient departments (OPD) of a medical center in Taiwan. Subjects received personalized multidisciplinary intervention, including physical therapy, psychotherapy, a nutritional consultation, precise medicine, and social resource linkage, as determined by the results of their CGAs. After 3 months of interventions, change in the proportions of the frail status (frail, pre-frail and robust), functional scores, depressive status, cognition, nutritional status, percentage of inappropriate medication used and social resource usage were analyzed. A logistic regression model was applied to determine the predictive factors associated with an improvement in frail severity. Results: A significant improvement in frail status was found (proportion of frail: 44.5% versus 23.1%, p < 0.001). Physical function, depressive and nutritional status were also significantly improved. 18.5% of participants used inappropriate medications, with benzodiazepine hypnotics the most common (40.9%). 24.2% of subjects were successfully linked to social resources. The presence of the frail phenotypes exhaustion was significantly associated with an improvement in frail severity (odds ratio (OR) = 2.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.15–6.66, p = 0.023). There was a significant dose response relationship between the improvement of frail status and physical training times (proportion of improved frail status: 23.7%, 40.5% and 47.9% for 0, 1–3, and 4–6 times of physical training, p = 0.03). Conclusion: The reported CGA-based, personalized multidisciplinary intervention model was effective at improving frail severity among pre-frail and frail elderly in OPDs.

Clinical course and mortality in older patients with COVID-19: a cluster-based study in Hong Kong.

INTRODUCTION: Compared with previous waves of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Hong Kong, the third wave involved a greater number of frail older patients. Because local healthcare policy required hospitalisation for all older adults with COVID-19, we aimed to investigate the clinical course and outcomes in such patients. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included all patients aged ≥65 years who were admitted to Tuen Mun Hospital for management of COVID-19 between 1 July 2020 and 31 August 2020. We reviewed baseline characteristics, clinical presentation, laboratory results, complications, and outcomes. We also investigated the associations of age and Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) score with in-patient mortality. RESULTS: In total, 101 patients were included (median age, 73 years); 52.5% were men and 85% had at least co-morbid chronic disease. The most common symptoms were fever (80.2%) and cough (63.4%). Fifty-two patients (51.5%) developed hypoxia, generally on day 8 (interquartile range, 5-11) after symptom onset. Of the 16 patients who required intensive care unit support, 13 required mechanical ventilation. The overall mortality rate was 16.8%. Patients aged 65-69, 70-79, 80-89, and ≥90 years had mortality rates of 9.1%, 10%, 30%, and 25%, respectively. Patients with CFS scores of 1-2, 3-4, 5-6, and ≥7 had mortality rates of 5.7%, 14.7%, 23.5%, and 40%, respectively. A linear relationship was confirmed between the two mortality trends. CONCLUSION: Clinical deterioration was common in older patients with COVID-19; their overall mortality rate was 16.8%. Mortality increased linearly with both age and CFS score.

Older Age and Frailty are Associated with Higher Mortality but Lower ICU Admission with COVID-19.

Background: We report characteristics and outcomes of adults admitted to Canadian Immunization Research Network (CIRN) Serious Outcomes Surveillance (SOS) Network hospitals with COVID-19 in 2020. Methods: Patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 admitted to 11 sites in Ontario, Quebec, Alberta, and Nova Scotia up to December 31, 2020 were enrolled in this prospective observational cohort study. Measures included age, sex, demographics, housing, exposures, Clinical Frailty Scale, comorbidities; in addition, length of stay, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation, and survival were assessed. Descriptive analyses and multivariable logistic regressions were conducted. Results: Among 2,011 patients, mean age was 71.0 (range 19-105) years. 29.7% were admitted from assisted living or long-term care facilities. The full spectrum of frailty was represented in both younger and older age groups. 81.8% had at least one underlying comorbidity and 27.2% had obesity. Mortality was 14.3% without ICU admission, and 24.6% for those admitted to ICU. Older age and frailty were independent predictors of lower ICU use and higher mortality; accounting for frailty, obesity was not an independent predictor of mortality, and associations of comorbidities with mortality were weakened. Conclusions: Frailty is a critical clinical factor in predicting outcomes of COVID-19, which should be considered in research and clinical settings.

Mental health of older people in social isolation: the role of physical activity at home during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic involves a new coronavirus characterized by a respiratory disease resulting from an infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome by coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The severity and fatality of COVID-19 are directly related to age and immunocompromised states, with older adults making up the vast majority of cases. The elderly with a higher risk of serious complications due to COVID-19 and deaths are also the group most susceptible to the damage of social isolation, impacting on mental health, resulting in a more sedentary lifestyle, and health problems due to several causes, implying need for greater attention, care and protection. Physical activity has shown excellent results for mental health, being used in different treatments and populations, when considering the elderly, one of the ways to mitigate this impact on mental health is the practice of physical activity. Here, we discuss the impacts of social isolation on mental health and the role of physical activity and exercise in the homes of the elderly as a way to protect the spread of other diseases from all causes during the COVID-19 pandemic period. To this end, we discuss some possibilities that can be used by the elderly in the period of social isolation, to the point of remaining active within their homes.

Vision of the management of frailty in Primary Health Care

Primary Care (PC) and community are the priority health sites for the detection and management of frailty. There are good guidelines (Strategy and consensus of the National Health Service, ADVANTAGE European Joint Action, recommendations of the Program of Prevention and Health Promotion Activities of the Spanish Society of Family and Community Medicine PAPPS-semFYC, Fisterra guideline);however, its implementation is not taking place with the expected magnitude or speed, also considering the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic. The detection and management of frailty requires multidisciplinary work by professionals who usually carry out their activity at the first level of care (physicians, nurses, social workers), with others whose integration is advisable (nutritionists, physiotherapists, etc.);and counting on others of reference (geriatricians). On the other hand, it is necessary to work with comprehensive approaches based on good coordination between PC and the Community, with various experiences in this regard. The support by the Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) can be very interesting, with tools for both users and careers (e.g., VIVIFRAIL), as well as for social and health professionals (e.g., VALINTAN or WHO ICOPE-Handbook App). Strategies to intervene in fragility in a more effective and systematic way must be consolidated: with an adequate professional training, establishment of campaigns and dissemination ways for visualizing its relevance and extend their intervention, prioritization of the most effective programmed assistance activities (highlighting fragility), multidisciplinary work with coordination and participation of the different healthcare and community levels and of the patients themselves, and providing the PC with adequate resources.